| olia lialina on Fri, 11 Mar 2022 16:04:28 +0100 (CET) | 
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| <nettime> Disarming Chekhov’s Gun | 
    
https://pad.profolia.org/s/chekhovs_gun
The plan was to write a description for a
        series of lectures and conversations at Merz Akademie in
        upcoming semester, but it became a manifesto, I'd like to share
        with you.
      
    
Disarming Chekhov’s Gun
The mantra passed down from generation to generation “you can’t put a loaded gun on stage if no one means to fire it” first appeared in a letter Chekhov wrote to a young writer, criticizing the way his vaudeville was structured:
          "Dear Alexander Semyonovich!
          I received your vaudeville and immediately read it. It’s
      beautifully written, but its architecture is obnoxious. It’s not
      scenic at all. Think about it. Dasha’s first monologue is
      completely unnecessary. It stands out like a sore thumb. It would
      have fit if you wanted to make Dasha more than just a supporting
      role, and if this monolog – that promises a lot to the audience –
      had anything to do with the content or the effects of the play.
      You can’t put a loaded gun on stage if no one means to fire it.
      You can’t make promises. Let Dasha be silent altogether – that’s
      better."[1]
      
      Dasha, her first monologue and its unkept promise did not go down
      in history, but the analogy of the loaded gun left on stage
      unfired did: Chekhov’s Gun – the dramaturgic principle that
      advises authors to remove irrelevant elements from their stories,
      be it in novels, theater plays, or later in films and television
      scripts. Closer to the end of the 20th century, the concept also
      entered the digital realm, from interactive fiction to Extended
      Reality.
      
      But it is not only in literature and entertainment of all genres
      and media where playwrights’ rules are applied. Dramaturgic
      principles have long taken over the socio-political spheres of our
      lives that are computer mediated since digital environments like
      Aristotelian drama happened to be an “imitation of an action with
      a beginning, middle and end, which is meant to be enacted in real
      time”, as Brenda Laurel pointed out in Computers as Theatre, 1991.
      
      A century after Chekhov warned against leaving unfired guns on
      stage, Laurel recognized the same pattern – “gratuitous
      incidents”[2] and the unwanted effect it can have in the design of
      software, when on staging an interactor’s experience. To properly
      script user’s expectations and actions no minor detail standing in
      the way of “constraining what is probable”[3].
      
      30 years later software got more sophisticated, complex, and
      literally invisible. It means that today these constraints need to
      be tighter than ever before. Designers of chatbots, robots, and
      immersive environments take care that guns are fired or
      nonexistent. To succeed in fully automated environments, CGR –
      Chekhov’s Gun Recognition[4] algorithm, was suggested recently
      …and then there is the concept of Schrödinger’s Gun[5], a
      combination of Schrödinger’s Cat and Chekhov’s Gun, an algorithm
      that can render any numerically represented element from
      gratuitous to necessary. Everything can be turned into a loaded
      gun in computer generated environments.
      
      Outside of tropes and virtual worlds, the playwright’s principle
      has become a curse. There is Alec Baldwin’s Gun that was
      supposedly just a prop, and currently, there are Putin’s guns that
      we so much wanted to believe were just for show, not loaded at
      all, or at least would not fire.
      
      What if Chekhov’s letter was never written, got lost or was simply
      ignored? What if the unimportant Dasha had a chance to recite her
      unnecessary monologue?
      
      Imagine a world where our lives weren’t shaped by the predictable
      laws of drama and we were not a part of Aristotle’s tragic
      progression.
      
      Leave the guns unfired and give the stage to Dasha!
--
    Т. 3. Письма, Октябрь 1888 — декабрь 1889. — М.: Наука, 1976.
      — С. 273—275. [my translation] Source
      http://chehov-lit.ru/chehov/letters/1888-1889/letter-707.htm ↩︎
      
          Laurel B, Computers as Theatre, 1993 p.74 ↩︎
      
          Ibid., p.76 ↩︎
      
          Tikhonov A., Yamshchikov I. Chekhov’s Gun Recognition, 2021
      https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.13855v1 ↩︎
      
          Robertson J., YoungR.M., Finding Schrödinger’s Gun, AIDE,
      October 2014 ↩︎
      
      
    
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: